4.1.9 International Competitiveness — Practice Questions

Seven original multiple-choice questions on international competitiveness, written to the style and difficulty of Edexcel Paper 2 Section A.

7 questions Edexcel A-Level Multiple choice Model answers included

7 questions in this set

  1. 1. Country A's total labour costs are £4.8m for an output of 600 units. Country B's are £7.0m for an output of 1,000 units. On unit labour costs, the more cost-competitive of the two is

    Calculation

    Select one answer
    Show model answer

    Answer: D (Country B, since its cost per unit is lower.). Competitiveness is about cost per unit, not the total wage bill.
    Country A: £4,800,000 ÷ 600 = £8,000 per unit.
    Country B: £7,000,000 ÷ 1,000 = £7,000 per unit.
    Country B spends more on labour in total and is still the cheaper producer, because its output is higher by proportionately more. On this measure A's unit labour costs are about 14% above B's. A total wage bill on its own says nothing whatever about competitiveness.

    Why the other options are wrong

    • A — A lower total wage bill usually just means a smaller operation. On its own it is uninformative.
    • B — Lower output is what makes A's cost per unit higher, not lower — the same fixed wage bill is spread over fewer units.
    • C — A higher total wage bill is not an advantage either. What matters is what that spending buys in output.
  2. 2. Wages in a country rise by 6% over a year while output per worker rises by 9%. The effect on its unit labour costs is that they

    Applied reasoning

    Select one answer
    Show model answer

    Answer: A (Fall, since output grew faster than pay.). Unit labour cost is total labour cost divided by output, so it depends on the race between pay and productivity. Wages rising 6% raise the numerator; output per worker rising 9% raises the denominator by more. The cost of producing each unit therefore falls, and the country becomes more cost-competitive despite paying its workers more. This is why rising wages are not in themselves a competitiveness problem — only wages rising faster than productivity are.

    Why the other options are wrong

    • B — Wages rising is only half of the calculation. What those wages produce has risen faster still.
    • C — Both figures being positive tells you nothing. It is which of the two is larger that decides the direction.
    • D — The two cancel only if they rise at the same rate, and here they do not.
  3. 3. A country's currency depreciates by 15% and stays there. For its exporters' price competitiveness, the immediate effect is

    Applied reasoning

    Select one answer
    Show model answer

    Answer: A (A gain, since their goods cost foreigners less.). A depreciation lowers the price of a country's goods when quoted in foreign currency, without the exporter changing its domestic price at all. That is an immediate gain in price competitiveness, and Edexcel lists exchange rates among the cost factors influencing it. The gain is not free: imported inputs become dearer, which raises costs over time, and it does nothing for the non-cost factors — quality, branding, innovation — that determine competitiveness in the longer run.

    Why the other options are wrong

    • B — A depreciation raises the cost of imported inputs rather than lowering it.
    • C — This is what an appreciation would do. A depreciation makes exports cheaper abroad.
    • D — Domestic prices are indeed unchanged, and that is exactly why foreign buyers now pay less in their own currency.
  4. 4. A country's exports command premium prices even though its unit labour costs are among the highest in its industry. The most likely explanation is that it competes on

    Applied reasoning

    Select one answer
    Show model answer

    Answer: D (Quality and brand rather than price.). Competitiveness is not only about cost. Edexcel divides the influences into cost factors — unit labour costs, exchange rates, inflation, productivity — and non-cost factors: innovation and technology, quality and branding, infrastructure and logistics. A country selling successfully at premium prices with high unit costs must be winning on the second group. Its buyers are paying for something other than a low price.

    Why the other options are wrong

    • A — A weaker currency would lower its export prices, and the stem says its prices are high.
    • B — Export market share is a measure of competitiveness, not a way of competing.
    • C — The stem says the opposite: its prices are at a premium.
  5. 5. Table 1 lists four changes affecting one country's exporters.
    From Table 1, the only one that works through a non-cost factor is

    Data interpretation

    Table 1: Four changes affecting one country's exporters
    Change
    Change 1 Unit labour costs fall relative to competitors
    Change 2 Its goods win an international reputation for reliability
    Change 3 The currency depreciates against major rivals
    Change 4 Productivity in export industries rises
    Select one answer
    Show model answer

    Answer: B (Change 2.). Edexcel separates the influences on competitiveness into cost and non-cost factors. Three of these changes work on cost: lower unit labour costs, a cheaper currency and higher productivity each reduce what it costs to deliver a unit to a foreign buyer. A reputation for reliability works quite differently — it is a matter of quality and branding, which Edexcel lists among the non-cost factors, and it wins orders even where it changes no price at all.

    Why the other options are wrong

    • A — Unit labour costs are the first cost factor on Edexcel's list.
    • C — The exchange rate is a cost factor: it changes the price foreign buyers pay without changing anything at home.
    • D — Productivity is a cost factor, and it works precisely by lowering unit labour costs.
  6. 6. A country's international competitiveness declines steadily over a decade. For the industries that export, the most likely consequence is

    Applied reasoning

    Select one answer
    Show model answer

    Answer: C (Job losses, as output and orders fall.). Edexcel sets out the problems of low competitiveness by consequence: weaker exports, slower growth, job losses in export-oriented industries, and a persistent current account deficit. The chain runs through orders. Goods that sell less well abroad mean less output, and less output in an export sector means fewer people employed in it. The effect is concentrated rather than spread, which is why declining competitiveness tends to show up as regional unemployment in the places where the exporting industries happen to be.

    Why the other options are wrong

    • A — Expansion into new markets is what high competitiveness delivers. This country is losing ground.
    • B — Firms invest where they expect demand to grow. Falling orders discourage investment rather than encouraging it.
    • D — Competitiveness is indeed relative — and this country is losing on that relative measure, which is precisely why its export industries contract.
  7. 7. A country responds to a long decline in competitiveness by letting its currency fall each time exports weaken. The main objection to relying on this is that it

    Applied reasoning

    Select one answer
    Show model answer

    Answer: B (Raises import prices and living costs.). A depreciation buys price competitiveness without any of the underlying improvement — productivity, quality, innovation — that would have earned it. The cost is paid at home: imported goods and inputs become dearer, so real incomes fall and inflation rises. The country is competing by becoming poorer rather than by becoming better — and because nothing structural has improved, the same problem returns and the currency has to fall again.

    Why the other options are wrong

    • A — A depreciation is precisely what changes the price foreigners pay, and it works. That is what makes it tempting.
    • C — Exports become more important under this strategy, not less.
    • D — The J-curve means the current account can worsen at first, but that is a timing effect rather than the main objection to the strategy.