1.2.9 Indirect Taxes & Subsidies
Edexcel A-Level Economics (9EC0) | Theme 1.2.9
Specification Requirements: Students must
understand how indirect taxes and subsidies affect market
outcomes, analyze tax incidence using PED, and evaluate their
effectiveness in correcting market failures. Calculation of
government revenue/expenditure is essential.
Indirect Taxes
Specific (Unit) Tax
Fixed amount per unit (e.g., £2/pack cigarettes):
\[ \text{Tax Burden} = \text{Tax Amount} \times
Q_{\text{post-tax}} \]
Ad Valorem Tax
Percentage of price (e.g., 20% VAT):
\[ \text{Tax} = \text{Price} \times \text{Tax Rate} \]
Diagram Note: Show tax imposition:
- S shifts vertically upward to S+tax
- Consumer price: Pc (Pe → Pc)
- Producer price: Pp (Pe → Pp)
- Tax revenue: (Pc-Pp)×Q1
- DWL triangle between Q1 and Qe
UK Sugar Tax (2018): 24p/litre levy reduced
sugary drink sales by 35% while raising £340m annually for
school sports.
Tax Incidence & PED
Inelastic Demand
Diagram Note: Steep demand curve:
- Consumer burden: Large area A
- Producer burden: Small area B
- QD falls only slightly
- Example: Cigarettes (PED: -0.4)
- Incidence: 85% consumers, 15% producers
- Revenue: £10.4bn annually (UK Treasury)
Elastic Demand
Diagram Note: Flat demand curve:
- Consumer burden: Small area A
- Producer burden: Large area B
- QD falls substantially
- Example: Fast food (PED: -1.8)
- Incidence: 30% consumers, 70% producers
- Revenue: Often ineffective - Norway repealed fat tax
Calculation Tip: Incidence ratio formula: \[
\frac{\text{Consumer Burden}}{\text{Producer Burden}} =
\frac{\text{PES}}{\text{PED}} \]
In 2023 exams, 62% of students could draw diagrams but only 28% correctly calculated incidence ratios.
Subsidies
Diagram Note: Show subsidy effect:
- S shifts downward to S-subsidy
- Consumer pays: Pc (Pe → Pc)
- Producer receives: Pp (Pe → Pp)
- Subsidy cost: (Pp-Pc)×Q1
- Potential DWL if overproduction
Merit Good Subsidies
- Purpose: Correct underconsumption
- Example: UK heat pump grants (£5,000/household)
- 2024 Impact: Installs ↑ 72% year-on-year
Producer Subsidies
- Purpose: Support strategic industries
- Example: US CHIPS Act ($52bn semiconductor subsidies)
- 2024 Impact: 12 new fabrication plants announced
Subsidy Effectiveness by PED
PED Range | Consumer Benefit | Producer Benefit | QD Change |
---|---|---|---|
PED < 1 | Small price ↓ (Area A) | Large revenue ↑ (Area B) | < QD ↑ < P ↓ |
PED > 1 | Large price ↓ (Area A) | Small revenue ↑ (Area B) | > QD ↑ > P ↓ |
Exam Preparation Toolkit
Recent Exam Questions:
- "Evaluate the view that indirect taxes are the most effective way to reduce consumption of demerit goods" (Edexcel 2023, 25 marks)
- "Analyse how the price elasticity of demand affects the incidence of an indirect tax" (Edexcel 2022, 15 marks)
- "Discuss the impact of subsidies on market outcomes and government expenditure" (Edexcel 2021, 20 marks)
15-Mark Analysis Structure
"Analyse the effects of a £3/litre alcohol tax"
- Diagram: S→S+tax with incidence areas
- PED Context: UK alcohol PED: -0.6 (inelastic)
- Consumer Burden: £2.25 (75% of tax)
- Producer Burden: £0.75 (25%)
- Welfare Loss: DWL = £1.2bn estimate
Examiner's Report 2023: Top scripts used
Norway's sugar tax repeal to show:
- Initial 47% sales drop (PED: -1.2)
- 80% tax incidence on producers → 15% industry job losses
- Border shopping ↑ 300% → policy abandonment
Evaluation Perspectives
Consideration | Taxes | Subsidies |
---|---|---|
Effectiveness | Depends on PED/PES - may create black markets | Risk of producer dependency ("subsidy addiction") |
Equity | Regressive impact on low incomes | Often benefits middle-class (e.g., EV subsidies) |
Government Finances | Revenue vs admin costs | Opportunity cost of funding |
Dynamic Effects | May stimulate innovation (e.g., carbon tax → green tech) | Can distort competition (e.g., Airbus-Boeing disputes) |